Friday, June 11, 2010

Ass Whupper in Chief

Clearly Obama’s latest 'kick ass' comment reflects a deeply ingrained sentiment that business is always cutting corners to make a buck - that without the punitive hand of government's stiff regulations and fines, business would run amok endangering lives en masse. Far left Democrats like Obama think that the pockets of the private sector are infinitely deep and there's no limit to what discipline can be inflicted upon them. They’ll always be there to fleece and humiliate. The Golden Goose is immortal. ‘Kicking ass’ is a childish way of dealing with that which they, the liberal elite, can make no constructive contribution to. Hell we don't know how to drill oil, make cars, develop drugs, treat sick people; we don’t really fix anything... but we do know how to punish those productive members of society that try and don't meet our penumbrious utopian standards. If one child gets sick a year in the whole country from some flavored fruit punch confectioneer, the answer’s always more regulation and a generous portion from a fresh can of 'Whoop Ass'. We really ought to thank Obama for finally openly verbally distilling the primary function of government down into a crude colloquialism that is easy for everyone to understand. Guess that makes the President Ass Whupper in Chief!

The discipline of the marketplace is and has always been a proven effective ‘ass-whupper’ and the financial losses, legal ramifications and potentially bankrupting effects of malfeasance are more than adequate in maintaining a commercial moral order. Additional government threats and the introduction of individual criminality can potentially have severely deleterious effects on the necessary incentives required to maintain a healthy private sector.

The ubiquitous assault on business prevalent in our present sociopolitical climate, I fear, succeeds in significantly reducing the prestige and social allure for those seeking a successful business career thereby possibly deflecting the entrance of many talented and ambitious citizens from lifestyles dedicated to economic innovation. In a word, it could create a private sector brain drain. The lure of higher compensation in many cases might not be sufficient to overcome the psychological fear of being branded as a social pariah. Success and happiness for most people is the combination of earned personal wealth with the earned admiration and respect of one’s fellows. The dominance of ubiquitous leftist anti-business sentiment may at this point have unfortunately succeeded in making too many of America’s most significantly required business careers morally repugnant. “I’d like to introduce you to my son Marvin. He’s a very successful oil driller. I don’t know where we went wrong. We really tried to direct him into a more meaningful vocation like urban planning or the environmental sciences but, in truth, he always did like picking the wings off flies.”

In short, I fear we’ve finally arrived historically at a point where the most attractive career option for the vast majority of the best and the brightest is working for the government. Looking at the lifestyles and retirements of the bulk of our federal and state employees it’s, unfortunately getting pretty hard to argue against - plus you'll never get your chicken-shit non-presidential ass whupped....


M.D.T.

1 comment:

  1. After making his "A: remark, the Communist in Chief went on national TV approximately a week later with his "B" plan -- which was to attempt to exalt us with high flying rhetoric in that typical leftist scolding fashion about energy independence, etc - and then ended with an appeal to a "higher power." Huh? Apparently, he can accomplish verbal acrobatics and jump from crude to a reference to the divine in the span of a few days. As Nietzsche would say: "Human, human, all-too-human." (Not a good thing).

    And so, now, with the oil spill crisis behind us, it is time to go to the next crisis and find a reason to pour trillions on the next flaming alter of need (read: support my friends). But what about that oil crisis? For all of the Presidential whupassing and blah blah from the left and media -- how did this crisis get resolved? Government? A law? A protest? A mob carrying signs? A leftist anti-tea party frenzy? A whupass threat? No, not really.

    A team of highly skilled engineers worked around the clock to produce a design to create a new device that had never been used before, tailor made to the need at hand. No one sat around with their feet up in the air complaining. People bent over their computers and fabricated a design for a product that was the result of human ingenuity - the only thing that really matters when it comes to the story of human progress. For all of the arm flailing, hot air, call to new world vision - everything that the Communist in Chief says is all for naught -- it is merely hot air and a leftist babble frenzy. We will probably never know the names of the heroes who designed the fix -- they will never be interviewed on television, heralded as great men and women. They're just a bunch of working stiffs who did their jobs because if they didn't, this skinny little Communist in Washington was going to whup their A. Right, that is how the world works -- at least that's how it works in Washington. I am reminded of an interview I saw of an old Bolshevik commissar who was laughing and reminiscing about the Communist revolution. "Oh, yes," he said. "I did threaten people. I would tell Farmers: 'Bring in the grain - or else!"

    Yes, comrades - bring in the grain, or else! Isn't that how the world works. Whose "A" do I whup? Can anyone tell me the difference between those two statements?

    All hail the Communist in Chief.

    ReplyDelete